Network Feed Guidelines
The Network feed is one shared space used by creators across the whole Infinitum LIVE roster. Four rules govern it. This page states them, explains why each one exists, shows what compliant and non-compliant posts actually look like, and documents what happens when a post is removed — including how to appeal.
When you publish in the app, InfiniView shows a short Before you post confirmation covering the same four rules. This page is the long-form public reference that creators, managers, and moderators all work from, so if the confirmation and this page ever seem to disagree, this page is the version to read.
Rule 1: No spam
Avoid repetitive posts, excessive self-promotion, or flooding the feed. If you need to share an update more than once, wait until there is a meaningful change — new context, a new schedule detail, or a genuine follow-up — rather than repeating the same message.
The reason is that a shared feed is a shared budget of attention, and it is finite. If every creator on the roster posts three times a day, no individual post gets read, including yours. Volume does not increase your reach in a space like this; it decreases everyone's, and the creators who post most are usually the ones who see the least return, because readers learn to scroll past a familiar name that always says the same thing.
"Meaningful change" is the useful test. A post is not repetitive because it is on the same topic as your last one. It is repetitive because it contains nothing the reader did not already have. Adding a real detail — a result, a change of plan, an answer to a question someone asked — makes a follow-up worth posting.
Fine
- "Moving my LIVE nights from Wednesday to Thursday starting next week."
- "Tried opening with a question instead of small talk — retention in the first five minutes roughly doubled."
- "Following up on last week's post: the audio fix everyone recommended worked, here's the mic I ended up with."
Removable
- The same "don't forget to follow me" post every morning.
- Four posts in an hour, each with one word of new information.
- Copy-pasting the identical text you posted yesterday.
- Comment strings of emoji on dozens of posts to push your name up the feed.
Rule 2: No "join me live" posts in the general feed
Do not share your LIVE profile link or ask people to join you live in the general Network feed. Use the dedicated LIVE Now and Live Boosts areas in InfiniView for that instead. Match-related promotion belongs in the LIVE Match surfaces when a valid schedule applies.
This is the rule creators push back on most, so it deserves the actual reasoning rather than just enforcement. It is arithmetic. Every creator on the roster has a legitimate reason to promote their stream, and a large share of them are live during the same evening hours. A feed that allows "I'm live, come through" becomes nothing but that within about a week. At which point the thing the feed was genuinely good for — someone posting "my retention collapses around the twenty minute mark, what am I doing wrong" and getting six real answers from people who have solved it — is buried under promotion and stops happening.
Separating the surfaces is not anti-promotion. It is what makes promotion work. Someone browsing LIVE Now is looking for a stream to join right now; that is a far better audience for your announcement than someone scrolling the feed for advice. Posting it in the feed reaches fewer interested people and costs the feed its usefulness.
The line in practice: talking about your stream is fine, recruiting viewers to it is not. "Here's what I learned from last night's stream" belongs in the feed. "I'm live now, come join" belongs in LIVE Now.
Rule 3: Links and other platforms
Only TikTok and YouTube links are allowed in Network feed posts. Do not
promote Instagram, Twitch, Kick, OnlyFans, or other platforms in posts. Network-owned domains
such as infinitumlive.com and infinitumcreatornetwork.com may also be
permitted by backend policy.
Two separate concerns sit behind this. The first is scope. This is a TikTok LIVE creator network; the feed exists to help members improve on TikTok LIVE. A creator recruiting the roster to a competing streaming platform is using a resource the network provides against the purpose it was provided for. YouTube is allowed because it is where creators legitimately post clips, tutorials, and stream archives that are useful to other members.
The second is safety. Open link posting in any community reliably attracts scams, and creators are a specifically targeted group — fake brand deals, fake agency recruitment, "verification" services, engagement sellers. Restricting links to a small allowlist removes most of that attack surface without needing to catch each scam individually. Link checks are automated, which also means a legitimate link can occasionally be caught; that is what the appeal route is for.
Attempts to route around the rule count as breaking it. Spelling a domain out to defeat the filter, putting the link in an image, telling people to "check the link in my bio", or moving it into a comment are all the same violation with an extra step.
Rule 4: Enforcement
Posts that break these rules may be removed without warning. Repeated violations can result in posting privileges being limited or revoked. Moderators and automated checks exist to protect feed quality for the whole roster.
"Without warning" is deliberate and worth being honest about. Spam that stays up for a day while a warning is discussed has already done the damage the rule exists to prevent. Removal is the fast, reversible action; sanctions on your account are the slow, considered ones. The rest of this page explains how each side of that works, because a rule with an opaque enforcement process is a rule nobody can follow reliably.
Where self-promotion stops and spam starts
Nobody is asking you to be modest. Creators posting about their own work is most of what makes a creator community worth having. The distinction that matters is whether the post gives the reader something.
A post that shares a result, a mistake, a lesson, or a question is contributing, even when it is entirely about you. "I hit my first 200k month, here's the schedule I ran" is a good post precisely because the schedule is in it. "I hit my first 200k month" alone is a fine thing to celebrate and other creators will celebrate with you — post it once. The failure mode is the post that asks the reader for something (follow me, boost me, come to my stream) while offering nothing, repeated until it is noise.
A practical self-check before posting: if you were scrolling and this post were written by somebody else, would you stop for it? If the answer is no, the post is probably not ready rather than the feed being unfair to you.
Solicitation, money, and off-platform requests
Some things are out of bounds regardless of how they are worded. Do not use the feed to ask other creators for money, gifts, loans, or donations. Do not sell services to the roster — including anything that promises followers, views, engagement, verification, or ranking improvements. Those services do not work as advertised, and the creator who buys them carries the account risk alone while the seller keeps the payment. The network does not sell growth shortcuts and does not permit them to be sold in its community.
Be equally careful in the other direction. If someone contacts you off-platform after seeing you in the feed with a brand deal, a management offer, or a payment that requires you to send money or account credentials first, treat it as a scam until proven otherwise. Genuine network opportunities come through managers in the app, never from a stranger's direct message. Our creator safety guide covers the common patterns in detail.
Also treat other creators' privacy as you would want yours treated: do not post someone else's personal information, screenshots of private conversations, or details about their earnings or account status without their agreement.
What a genuinely good post looks like
Rules describe the floor. This is the part that describes what we are actually trying to protect.
Posts that consistently work
- A specific problem with specific details. "Retention drops hard at minute twenty on my Tuesday streams but not my Saturdays — same setup, what should I look at?" People can actually answer that.
- Something you tried and what happened. Including when it failed. A post about a change that did not work saves the next ten creators the same week.
- A concrete recommendation. The mic you bought, the light placement that fixed your shadows, the phrase you now open with.
- Congratulating someone else properly. Naming what they did well is worth more to them than a row of emoji, and it is how a roster starts behaving like a group.
- A question you think is too basic. It is not. Half the roster has it and has not asked.
A pattern in all of them: the post is written for the reader. That single habit keeps you clear of every rule on this page without having to think about the rules.
Comments
The same standards apply to comments, with one addition: comments must not be used to bypass feed rules. A LIVE link in a comment is the same Rule 2 violation as a LIVE link in a post, and posting a promotional comment on twenty unrelated posts is Rule 1 spam.
Beyond that, be constructive. Feedback is the main reason the feed exists, and blunt, specific feedback is welcome — "your first minute is too slow, you spend it apologizing for being late" is genuinely useful. What is not welcome is contempt, pile-ons, or criticism of a person rather than the work. A creator posting a stream that went badly is doing the vulnerable thing that makes this community function, and treating that as an opening for mockery is the fastest way to stop it happening.
How moderation and removal work
Enforcement runs on two layers. Automated checks catch the mechanical violations at post time — disallowed links, obvious duplicate content, and similar patterns. These are fast and consistent, and being automated they occasionally catch something legitimate. Human moderators and managers handle the judgement calls: whether a post is contributing or is promotion with a thin coat of context, whether a heated exchange crossed a line, whether a pattern of posts adds up to spam even though no single post does.
When a post is removed, moderators work from a fixed set of removal reasons tied directly to the four rules above. That is intentional: it means a removal is traceable to a published rule rather than to somebody's mood, and it means two moderators handling similar posts should reach similar outcomes. Reports from other creators are reviewed against the same rules — a report is not itself a verdict, and a post that follows the rules stays up regardless of how many people dislike it.
Removal of a post is not a mark against your standing in the network. Most removals are a first-time misunderstanding of Rule 2 or Rule 3, and they end there.
How to appeal a removal
If you believe a removal was wrong — most often an automated link check catching a legitimate TikTok or YouTube URL — open a support case in the app and include what the post said and when you published it. Cases go to your manager with your account context attached, which is why this is a better route than raising it in the feed.
Managers review appeals against this page, which is the whole reason the rules are published publicly and in this much detail. A reversal is a normal outcome when the rule was applied to a post that did not actually break it. What does not help your appeal is reposting the removed content while the case is open, since that reads as evasion and is itself a separate violation.
If you are unsure whether something is allowed before you post it, ask your manager first. That takes a minute and is always cheaper than an appeal.
Repeat violations
Consequences scale with pattern, not with a single mistake. In rough order: the post is removed; a manager explains the rule; continued violations after that explanation lead to posting privileges being limited; sustained abuse leads to them being revoked. Deliberate evasion — filter workarounds, reposting removed content, using alternate accounts — moves faster through that sequence than an honest misreading of a rule, because the intent is different.
Losing posting privileges affects community surfaces only. It does not touch your performance tracking, your training progress, your battle matchmaking, or your access to a manager. The feed is one part of the network, and a feed problem is handled as a feed problem.
Conduct outside the feed can still matter, though. Harassment of other creators, on-platform or off, is a network membership issue rather than a moderation issue, and it is handled as one.
How these rules relate to TikTok's Community Guidelines
These are two separate rule sets and it is important not to confuse them.
TikTok's Community Guidelines govern your TikTok account. They decide whether you keep access to LIVE and to monetization features. TikTok enforces them, TikTok changes them, and TikTok's own documentation is always the authority. We do not enforce TikTok policy and we cannot overturn a TikTok enforcement decision — that limit is stated plainly on our About page.
These feed guidelines govern one shared space inside InfiniView. They are house rules for a creator community, not platform policy, and they are narrower: mostly about spam, promotion routing, and links. Following them perfectly says nothing about whether your TikTok account is in good standing, and vice versa.
Where they overlap is in spirit rather than in text. Both are aimed at genuine participation over manipulation. Engagement manipulation — like-spam requests, chanting, mass identical comments, purchased engagement — is a problem in a TikTok LIVE room and in this feed for the same underlying reason: it substitutes activity for value. If you want the TikTok side properly, read our guide to Community Guidelines for LIVE creators, and for content design decisions read creating responsible LIVE content. Network creators can also complete the community guidelines module in Creator Academy after signing in.
Questions about these rules
Creators on the roster should raise questions with their manager through a support case. Anyone else — including researchers, partners, or platforms reviewing our standards — can reach us through the Contact page. For context on the network these rules serve, see how the network operates and who operates it.